Huron County Rural Schools
3-5 Year Plan (2007-2011)
Vision: Raising Up Responsible Achieving Learners
Mission: The Huron County Rural Schools will serve all children in the community by providing opportunities for learning and skills necessary for a productive life.
Each student’s highest potential will be enhanced by a unique learning situation involving individualized attention/programs, and multi-level support in a close-knit setting.
Introduction: The purpose of the school improvement plan is to increase student achievement by concentrating on curriculum alignment, data collection and classroom management procedures.
This will be accomplished through professional development, teamwork, and continual effort towards enhancing academic success.
Goals
School improvement goals, as developed by the Huron County Rural School’s School Improvement Team on June 6, 2007 are:
To achieve the Rural School’s vision and mission and to guarantee that student achievement is always fulfilled we will:
1. To improve student achievement in the following academic areas:
Math (2007-2008)
Writing (2007-2008)
Science (2008-2009)
Social Studies (2009-2010)
2. To improve data and information collection, analysis, and interpretation.
3. To implement a Positive Behavior Support program.
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 1: To increase student achievement in math. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Curriculum alignment with state math curriculum. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Math curriculum shows correlation to state curriculum. |
|
Continue sending representative to Student Achievement Model training for math. |
Anne Kennedy |
Ongoing |
Increased proficiency on MEAP math assessment. |
|
Attend professional development opportunities in math. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Increased teacher proficiency of math curriculum. |
|
Training of AIMS implementation. |
Teachers ISD Staff |
Ongoing |
Increased understanding of test procedures and analysis of data. |
|
Summary of progress toward goal: MEAP math scores improved by 7% from 2007-2008. AIMSweb math and Algebra Probes were given to students with results pending.
|
|||
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 1: To improve student achievement in writing. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Send representatives to the Student Achievement Model Training for writing. |
Michelle Daniels Pam (Lackowski) Klee |
2007-2009 |
Increased proficiency on MEAP writing assessments. |
|
Step-Up-To-Writing Training or other Writing Workshops. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Increased daily writing activities and improved student paragraph development. |
|
Continual critique of current writing instruction. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Increased student performance in writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of progress toward goal: A 3-minute writing assessment was given to students in grades 1-8 with results pending. A new writing curriculum was developed and will be implemented in the 2008-2009 school year.
|
|||
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 1: To increase student achievement in science. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Curriculum alignment with state science curriculum. |
Teachers |
2008-2009 |
Science curriculum shows correlation to state curriculum. |
|
Send representatives to Student Achievement Model training for science. |
Kathy Cregeur Jennifer Eugster Jessica Tenbusch |
2008-2010 delayed by HISD |
Increased proficiency on MEAP science assessment. |
|
Attend professional development opportunities in science. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Increased teacher proficiency of science curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of progress toward goal:
|
|||
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 1: To increase student achievement in social studies. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Curriculum alignment with state social studies curriculum. |
Teachers |
2008-2009 |
Social Studies curriculum shows correlation to state curriculum. |
|
Send representatives to Student Achievement Model training for social studies. |
David Phelps Torri Ferris |
2009-2011 |
Increased proficiency on MEAP social studies assessment. |
|
Attend professional development opportunities in social studies. |
Teachers |
Ongoing |
Increased teacher proficiency in social studies curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of progress toward goal: A new Social Studies curriculum has been evaluated and new textbooks will be adopted. |
|||
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 2: To improve data and information collection, analysis, and interpretation. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Student achievement data and information is collected from various state and local sources. (MEAP, DIBELS, AIMSweb) |
State and local sources and teachers. |
Ongoing |
Student test scores. |
|
Student achievement data and information will be analyzed and interpreted. |
Teachers and Support Staff |
Ongoing |
Students will be placed into necessary intervention programs. (Read Naturally, Spelling and Reading Mastery, Title I, STAR math) |
|
Progress monitoring |
Teachers and Support Staff Title I Instructors |
Ongoing |
Graphs and visual aids to show development over time. |
|
Training on interpretation of test scores. |
Teachers, ISD Staff |
Ongoing |
Increased teacher proficiency of data interpretation. |
|
Summary of progress toward goal: Teachers attended a training by HISD staff on interpretation of test scores. This interpretation was used in our Education Yes! document.
|
|||
Goal Action Plan
|
Goal 3: To implement a Positive Behavior Support program. |
|||
|
Description of Activity |
Person/s Responsible |
Timeline |
Measurement/Indicator of Success |
|
Identify expectations, teach behaviors, and monitor and reinforce positive behaviors. |
Jessica Tenbusch Pam (Lackowski) Klee |
Ongoing |
Reduced behavioral problems within the school environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of progress toward goal: The PBS plan now contains lesson plans to teach expected behaviors. A student referral form was developed and will be used to evaluate behaviors that need to improve.
|
|||
I. Community resources
Various speakers from
the community are called upon each year to present information on their
respective areas of expertise.
II. Role of adult and community education, libraries, and community colleges
Local libraries are a vital
resource for our schools since school libraries are not always adequate to meet
the needs of our students. Adult education does
not play a role in our schools since our schools are elementary schools.
III. Building level decision-making
Building level decisions are made in
cooperation with the teacher, the school board, and (when appropriate) the
superintendent. Monthly board meetings are an adequate forum for this process.
IV. Methods for effective use of technology
All students are given equal time and access to technology in each
building. Various forms of technology are used in each building; the forms of
technology range from computers to projectors. Our schools have published and
adopted a uniform technology plan that has been filed with the state department
of education. The plan has been approved by the appropriate state agency.
V. Structured on-the-job training
Since ours are elementary schools no on-the-job training is offered.
VI. Required stakeholders
The school improvement team is comprised of the teacher, a school board
member, and at least one parent from each of the districts. Any parent or
school board member is welcome and encouraged to attend meetings.